<ErCiccione1> Hey everybody, we (Haveno) set a bounty on monero-project/monero #7731. Resolve the issue to claim the bounty! Details in the issue, but let us know if there are questions.

A bit confused haha

wasn't visible to everyone on IRC

But you could see it on IRC?

Yes because I'm OP

Ah

oh, i thought it was some bridge weirdness. Thanks binaryFate

heh binaryFate is the bridge we needed :D

same for you right now sethsimmons btw, but I gave you voice so starting from "A bit confused..." everyone could read

why are my messages not relayed to freenode tho? This matrix accoutn is grouped with my registered freenode user

Unfortunately monero-guard is down atm, so no automatic voicing

Guess it's manual voicing here

ah i see, i thought that was solved.

ErCiccione1: it is relayed, because I can read them. But the channel is moderated so only OP can see messages of unvoiced people

And "ErCiccione1" wasn't voiced

Can you fix me in #monero and #monero-markets? I don't think people can see me there either ATM.

yeah now i got it.

sethsimmons: say something in each to try?

Done

ErCiccione1: but it doesn't show [m] so your messages don't seem to be coming from matrix?

The [m] is just the default, it can be removed (like for me

* The [m] is just the default, it can be removed (like for me)

oh ok, makes sense then

beside that, my matrix user is linked to my freenode user. So my irc account is not a dummy freenode account created by matrix (which have the standard [m])

Not all channels is voice-restricted, we keep it on monero-dev because of higher expected S/N ratio

ErCiccione1: normally monero-guard auto-voice people but it's down, so I'm not sure how the persistence of your "voice" can be. I'm also generally very confused about bridges and cross-network permissions :)

I registered ErCiccione and ErCiccione1 on the same account, so in theory if one is voiced the other one should be too, but it depends by how monero-guard works

and yeah permissions are messed up now with the spam protections, at least on matrix side

voice is per channel. Monero-guard is down, so nothing automatic right now

Inge-: yes with additional settings, not always

I just voiced you btw, since everyone couldn't see your question :)

needinfo: unfortunately the github repo and comments etc is protected to previous contributors only, yes due to spam

thx

<bevanoff[m]> Ok so about the multi destination uri request, is it okay to make changes directly to the existing function or should I make a new make_uri_multi (or whatever name) function with a separate api endpoint? I just don’t want to break anything people are already using

Adding to the existing seems best since it seems like a simple generalization of the current case.

Kinda depends on how the format changes though.

Ok cool, it shouldn’t be anything too disruptive

<woodser> hey, any opinions for a format to make and parse payment uris with multiple destinations and amounts? monero-project/monero #7731

<woodser> it's probably not too compressible but I guess it could be smaller than json using keys

Do we know who made the original format spec ?

In any case, it'd be nice if it was backward compatible.

ie, passing one address/amount with the new rules yields an URI that old rules parse correctly.

.merge+ 7735 7736

Added

^ adding boost compatibility fix early to fix compilation on some systems

what if it looked like this: monero:46BeWrHpwXmHDpDEUmZBWZfoQpdc6HaERCNmx1pEYL2rAcuwufPN9rXHHtyUA4QVy66qeFQkn6sfK8aHYjA3jk3o1Bv16em,46BeWrHpwXmHDpDEUmZBWZfoQpdc6HaERCNmx1pEYL2rAcuwufPN9rXHHtyUA4QVy66qeFQkn6sfK8aHYjA3jk3o1Bv16em?tx_amount=239.39014,123.55423&tx_description=donation,example

where commas separate duplicate kinds of data

or is there a better convention to follow?

if there's no commas then just follow original convention when parsing

Sounds good to me if nothing better can be found.

If you do intend on duplicating tx_description too, then , wooyuld have to be escaped in the actual text.

Oh right thanks