randomx + IoT = bad idea

"the first LiquorBot samples infected our honeypots in May 2019"

So honeypot is a right way to collect hidden miners.

unfortunately that bpsuck.hldns.ru is down now

I've found a way to detect mining pool of that malware xmrig-proxy without actual request to pool operator

It's nanopool too

total miners 27751

so should the blake stuff in randomx be replaced with blake2b?

er, blake3

Do they give an indication of the speed on various machine types ?

speedup*

sarang says x5, I assume for CPU but he did not say.

cool, has it just been published?

what is the blake thing about?

appears to have the same throughput as blake2b for short messages, so no benefit for RandomX

github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3-specs/blob/master/blake3.pdf --> Figure 3

I see thanks