06:34:15 <sech1> https://i.imgur.com/f3pyarr.png
06:39:07 <tevador> should perform on par with Ryzen
06:40:24 <tevador> and it's 14 nm, so I wouldn't expect a much higher efficiency than AMD
15:11:25 <hyc> I guess the question with POWER9 is how much below retail can you obtain the hardware? and it's about more than just the CPUs, the accompanying motherboards/systems aren't common either
15:13:31 <gingeropolous> woh. f2pool just overtook nanopool i think
15:13:50 <gingeropolous> chinas coming
15:19:38 <sech1> just? It's been like this since the fork
15:20:25 <gingeropolous> sorry. i thought i saw something different
15:21:20 <sech1> nanopool got hit hard with RandomX
15:21:28 <sech1> it was mostly GPU pool
15:22:25 <hyc> wouldn't all pre-randomX pools have been GPU?
15:22:54 <sech1> yes, but nanopool is "special"
15:22:58 <sech1> big farms use it
15:23:06 <sech1> mostly from ETH
15:25:11 <gingeropolous> this thing must be connected to a raspberry pi running monero on windows 7 https://community.xmr.to/blocks/frequencies/
15:25:48 <gingeropolous> inside a wafflemaker
15:33:46 <sech1> https://www.reddit.com/r/Ravencoin/comments/esq3th/ravencoin_could_go_randomx/
15:36:28 <gingeropolous> these other coins should just consider merge mining with monero
15:37:08 <gingeropolous> if they remain independent , they are just gonna get opportunistically hashed by roving botnets or other high HR entities
15:37:24 <gingeropolous> rendering their chains unusable
15:38:58 <sech1> ahem... RVN has 2 times bigger emission in $/day
15:39:24 <sech1> $187k RVN vs $87k XMR
15:39:40 <moneromooo> o_O
15:40:08 <sech1> it's a small cap coin (relatively), but it has high emission
15:40:21 <sech1> so they could easily get 2 GH/s
15:41:21 <gingeropolous> i wonder if their market could handle the straight miner dumpage
15:41:26 <sech1> 49% yearly inflation as of now, wow
15:41:58 <sech1> they've been around for almost 2 years, so I guess demand/supply has stabilized by now
15:43:39 <sech1> so if they adopt RandomX, Monero will become "the small brother"
15:44:02 <hyc> that would be annoying
15:44:22 <sech1> on the other hand, 2020 XMR pump will fix the issue
15:44:37 <gingeropolous> yes, please make pump pull request
15:45:38 <gingeropolous> oh good. and monero has the "classic" diff adjustment algo, so massive HR changes would render monero super annoying to use
15:46:00 <sech1> I don't think it would be a problem at 2:1 ratio between coins
15:46:07 <sech1> it's more of a problem at 20:1 ratio
15:46:26 <sech1> where a single small pool can 51% the smaller coin
15:46:44 <sech1> --> ETC <---
15:46:57 <gingeropolous> and all raven is is a non-asic bitcoin?
15:47:14 <sech1> they have ASICs... for a second time already
15:47:23 <sech1> they did an algo tweak a few months ago, it didn't help
15:47:27 <sech1> sounds familiar?
15:47:57 <gingeropolous> man. we should launch a scam coin
15:50:30 <gingeropolous> hrm, ok they are adding things "assets, rewards, unique assets, messaging, and voting."... and fair launch. ok i guess
16:03:45 <gingeropolous> dangit sech
16:03:47 <gingeropolous> whered u go
20:26:25 <cohcho> the best know hashrate per 1 thread is 600 or 1200?
20:26:35 <cohcho> randomx hashrate *
20:51:27 <sech1> on Ryzen 3000?
20:51:49 <sech1> 1290 h/s per core, so 645 h/s per thread
20:51:56 <sech1> but this is on my tuned system
21:01:34 <nioc> sech1: he is asking about running a single thread
21:02:46 <sech1> 848 h/s, just tested it
21:03:02 <sech1> even 848.5 h/s
21:03:17 <sech1> this is 3700X @ 4.1 GHz
21:30:59 <binaryFate> <gingeropolous> this thing must be connected to a raspberry pi running monero on windows 7 https://community.xmr.to/blocks/frequencies/ <--- lol sowwy. I asked this to get fixed, firmly this time