gingeropolous: there are ~15% of such blocks within last 90 * 720 blocks, It must be mostly f2pool.com blocks since it doesn't support xmr-node-proxy and can use only 4 bytes extra

I've checked pools with non-empty last_block at miningpoolstats.com and only monero.ragerx.lol uses 39 bytes long extra

The interesting parts to look at are the moments when monerod reports ~60 blocks in 60 minutes.

network hashrate is growing faster than hashrate of some miners

And there are only 11 blocks since hardfork 1978433 from monerod miners (with 33 bytes tx_extra)

Also f2pool located in china (it explains 500ms delay) and It's interesting to know how many hopes are needed to reach them via tor

i wonder if selfish mining is the only way they can really get blocks on the chain

What are you talking about?

i ponder if the block propagation delay makes it so if they only push 1 block to the network, its more likely to get orphaned

they have to push blocks through the great firewall of china, correct?

or get around it

so the network finds a block (t0), it takes 500 ms to get to f2pool (t+500ms). All other miners on the network have had 500 ms of extra mining. f2pool finds a block, say at t+1m500ms .... eh i dunno

99 tx_extra is being used only by minergate.com

99 bytes long*

randomx in the browser: i.imgur.com/u89O7Xw.png

I still need to polish the source code a bit

Did you find a way to set rounding?

26ms without dataset looks good

and the result is correct

in hidden miner binary: "Copyright © Donal Trump 2017"

26 ms per hash? It must be with JIT, how did you manage to do JIT in browser?

sech1: real world example of that config format 185.227.81.163/config.txt

from here app.any.run/tasks/0cde956b-6d48-481b-9ee2-6c3b2751a170

hint: it's being called from the browser, but that doesn't mean the code is actually running there

randomx as a service?

It must be then that thin wrapper around randomx library with listening socket

bingo (not that thin, though)

Ooooh. Neat!

~7 ms per hash with full dataset (as measure from chrome)

Send a patch to repo.getmonero.org/selene/primo :D

browser plugin should not be required

But surely it's compatible with one ?

(or was that not a reply to me ?)

sure, but requiring the installation of a browser plugin is a hassle

Yes, that's not idea. I don't see a better way though.

(That doesn't involve installing software automatically by exploiting the browser)

the only thing that is required is the randomx service (with some control panel), no browser mods are needed

that's a good thing because it requires active consent by the user