13:25:56 <sarang_> Hello all
13:26:07 <moneromooo> hi
13:26:28 <sarang_> Finishing up my presentation for Triptych today... and reminding myself how to use the TikZ drawing package in LaTeX... again...
15:19:48 <sarang_> Ugh, now I'm "sarang_"
15:19:58 <sarang_> Anyone remember how to get rid of that?
15:20:00 <sarang_> I never remember
15:20:15 <moneromooo>  /nick sarang
15:20:24 <sarang> aha
15:20:32 <sarang> I was trying to get NickServ to do it
15:21:05 <moneromooo> "/msg nickserv regain sarang" if it was busy timing out.
15:21:22 <sarang> IRCCloud was having some issues
15:21:26 <sarang> seems to be fine now, thanks
17:40:38 <sgp_> sarang: let me know if I can help with OBS and the recording
17:41:33 <sarang> Any thoughts from this channel on which YouTube channel to use for recording it?
17:41:42 <sarang> They are requiring a YouTube account, and I refuse to create one for this
17:41:55 <sarang> It's unclear if they want/allow it to actually be published via that account or not
17:42:01 <sarang> and TBH I don't really care
17:54:28 <sgp_> I'm still in the process of transferring the MCW one (waiting on Core). Monero Space is an option. It's probably up to you
17:55:29 <sarang> OK, well let's use whichever channel you have access to
17:55:44 <sarang> AFAIK it's basically private anyway unless they need to broadcast it in case of technical problems
17:55:55 <sarang> It sounds like they don't really know what they're doing when it comes to video and distribution, TBH
18:20:12 <sgp_> maybe that's part of the reason why the conference is cheap
18:21:33 <sarang> Anyway... any opposition to using the community account sgp_ has set up?
18:22:15 <sarang> Should it be permitted to release the video (rather than merely have it available to the organizers to show at the conference in the event of issues with the live presentation), any other community accounts would be free to host it as well, according to the Creative Commons license
18:22:39 <sarang> This is _not_ me taking any position on the legitimacy or goals of sgp_'s community group versus any others
18:22:47 <sarang> Merely a conference requirement that I find absurd
19:40:59 * Isthmus has no objections
20:42:07 <midipoet> i feel like IRCCloud is having some issues, as I am getting partial convos
20:43:08 <selsta> they had DoS problems today
20:43:09 <SerHack> midipoet: I love convos
20:44:02 <midipoet> convos spiritus
20:44:10 <midipoet> ambos
21:49:19 <suraeNoether> how many sub-addresses do we iterate through in the core client by default? can't find the answer to this one rn. :P
21:49:29 <suraeNoether> @sarang
21:49:36 <suraeNoether> haha @ lol what is this twitter
21:49:41 <moneromooo> 200+50 (or 50+200).
21:51:05 <suraeNoether> ty mooo <3
21:51:24 <sarang> :D
21:51:29 <sarang> Almost done with the Triptych talk
21:51:32 <sarang> I want one more diagram
21:51:47 <sarang> I go through basically zero of the math
21:52:00 <sarang> "If you want to be bored to tears by equations, read the paper"
23:43:35 <trashpanda[m]> Hi sarang, after reading the Triptych and Arcturus papers, it seems to me that Arcturus is more likely to see integration into Mknero than Triptych. Is that correct? Both are impressive works!
23:52:23 <sarang> Thanks, but Arcturus relies on an untested and novel cryptographic hardness assumption that may be safe or may be unsafe in practice
23:56:05 <trashpanda[m]> I see. I wondered if that was holding back its adoption.
23:56:13 <trashpanda[m]> Thanks!
23:57:52 <sarang> Well, Arcturus has not undergone successful peer review yet
23:58:18 <sarang> That and both Arcturus and Triptych would require significant (but well understood) changes to how multisig would need to be done
23:59:39 <trashpanda[m]> Here's hoping for peer review! 🍻