02:01:29 17:50 Or is O() being used as shorthand for 'on the order of'? < yeah I’ve seen/used it that way before. 02:02:10 I usually interpret it as complexity if there’s an N inside, and interpret it as “roughly order of” in there’s units :- P 03:14:00 needmoney90: it's a convenient misuse of notation 03:14:13 sorry for any confusion 03:14:22 read that as "on the order of..." 03:15:22 At least I'm not going crazy 03:16:15 Nope :D 07:18:49 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268396220944406 11:59:29 ok who's going to spend the $37.50 so we can all read that 11:59:29 :-P 12:06:04 i can't believe my work is valued so cheaply :p 12:06:11 that took years! 12:20:42 who does the $37.50 even go to 12:22:22 the publishers only 12:22:57 meanies 12:23:57 i guess they view that author's gain reputational/professional compensation in kind 12:31:41 They view that if you take some numbers here and put them there instead, it looks like they end up better off. So they quickly learn to put numbers there. Simple as that. 12:33:02 We're wired for that. Us first (except after you have children). Then family. Then friends. Since a few thousand years, people born inside the same imaginary lines on a map. After first contact, earthlings. 12:34:05 * moneromooo sees the channel and shuts up 13:36:23 adding sci-hub.tw in front of pay-walled links to scientific papers is the way to go, but generally authors have the right to publish their own work on their websites 13:42:21 midipoet: congrats on the publication! 13:42:45 Is there a preprint version available? 14:03:32 yeah. i guess so. but if i am honest, i know there were some last copy-editing issues between the print and preprint, so wanted to tidy them up 14:04:40 ah ok 14:04:57 I ask because that way the preprint version could presumably be distributed publicly and freely 14:05:12 (please do not use this channel to advocate for, or enable, copyright infringement) 14:05:35 zkao is correct that generally authors are allowed to host their publications on a personal website 14:05:48 Probably depends on the journal's distribution and copyright agreement 14:05:59 I've seen that on journals to which I've submitted 14:06:28 I know that's the case for applied physics letters/AIP 14:06:46 Yeah, and often specific exceptions for preprint servers too, like arXiv 14:08:00 At any rate, having a preprint to link publicly would be great :D 14:08:02 May I post my article online or otherwise distribute it without permission from SAGE? 14:08:02 Yes, please visit our Guidelines for SAGE Authors to review how, as an author, you may share your Contribution. 14:08:19 there is full info here: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use 14:08:49 You may share the Original Submission or Accepted Manuscript at any time after your paper is accepted and in any format. Your sharing of the Original Submission or Accepted Manuscript may include posting a downloadable copy on any website, saving a copy in any repository or network, sharing a copy through any social media channel, and distributing print or electronic copies. 14:09:44 * moneromooo takes back the earlier sarcasm, that's pretty fair 14:10:48 Ah ok, so you can't distribute the final journal-formatted copy that they prepare 14:10:54 but you can distribute the version you sent them 14:11:17 right, or the corrected version after editorial review 14:11:22 just not their pdf basically 14:11:50 midipoet: go for it! 14:13:03 jwinterm: to be fair, in the email they sent to me it words things differently. 14:13:25 How so? 14:14:15 oh maybe it is the same 14:14:20 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/76eQ4wmq/Screenshot%202020-08-28%20at%2015.13.38.png 14:14:37 That's consistent 14:14:42 Accepted version: yes 14:14:46 Published version: no 14:14:53 it doesn't say sharing though. just hosting 14:15:00 but i suppose that is maybe one and the same 14:15:17 Well, I'd go with the official policy on their website, if it were me 14:15:20 and that email seems consistent 14:15:35 They seem to differentiate between individual sharing for research purposes, and making publicly available 14:16:03 generally you are also allowed to share the final journal pdf on an individual basis also, just not mass distribution 14:16:13 Yeah, and that's in the policy too 14:16:16 this is why researchgate allows you to bother people to send you their articles 14:16:32 Journals are pretty chill about sharing with your colleagues for research purposes, as long as it isn't en masse 14:16:40 right 14:16:45 I dunno about chill 14:16:50 lol 14:16:54 "apparently chill" 14:17:13 probably abiding by some legal mumbo jumbo about fair use of intellectual property or something 14:17:15 but yea 14:17:18 Better than being chilling. 14:17:25 oooh, burn 14:17:27 chill burn 14:17:49 Better than chilli burn. 14:17:55 * moneromooo looks for the door 14:17:56 -____- 14:18:15 If the knob is hot to the touch, don't use that door 17:54:28 Remember that knaccc trick to replace the random mask with a deterministic one? Is that documented somewhere in ZtM2 (or elsewhere)? 17:56:25 https://web.getmonero.org/library/Zero-to-Monero-2-0-0.pdf 17:56:43 PDF page 61 (page 53 printed on the page headers) 17:57:15 ty 18:11:52 If anyone is interested, I'd appreciate proofreading of the ESORICS CBT workshop version of the Triptych paper: https://www.overleaf.com/read/zvzmgmpnppmq 18:12:16 This is the version that will be submitted for publication after the workshop; it's been reformatted with minor changes to assure proper formatting 18:12:33 Ten sarangpoints to anyone to finds a typo or other error! 18:13:00 And yes, there's a TeX warning about float placement, which was introduced to adhere to the 18-page limit 18:13:10 (because for some reason, digital journals require huge margins and page limits...) 18:13:27 s/to finds/who finds 18:13:27 sarang meant to say: Ten sarangpoints to anyone who finds a typo or other error! 18:13:32 ^ that typo does not count =p 18:14:15 Classic TeX... margin overrun? Add or remove words to convince it to line up properly...