Not sure if correct channel to ask, but for the Atomic Swaps proposal, will there be a written summary with each successfully completed milestone?

Think it would be a good way to inform the community as well as the donors

Could ask in #monero-swap

dEBRUYNE yes, that is something we should do

I think a monthly update, similar to how surae and sarang did, would be stellar

It would provide a healthy balance (i.e. not too much work due to too frequent updates, but still sufficient to keep the community up to date)

ack, fyi funding went much faster than expected, and we havent yet managed to work for real on the project, will have a first team meeting next week

zkao: All right :)

Any particular thoughts from anyone on whether it would be useful for me to work on a BP+ implementation via CCS?

<sarang "Any particular thoughts from any"> Was there significant gains to be made from using BP+? I haven’t kept track so completely clueless

* > <@freenode_sarang:matrix.org> Any particular thoughts from anyone on whether it would be useful for me to work on a BP+ implementation via CCS?

Were there significant gains to be made from using BP+? I haven’t kept track so completely clueless

I think I remember something about it performing better in terms of proof size or maybe prover time?

There are size benefits

Would be interesting to work on imo since it would translate to smaller transactions/blocks

sarang: are you aware of any research (experimental or otherwise) into range proof techniques that go beyond BP+ in terms of size/performance? if not, then marginal improvements to BP won't be easily usurped and are worth nailing down