it would probably be smarter just to increase number of iterations as a gradual diff increase

doubling dataset size should only be done when we know tech level has gotten there, cache sizes are all 2x what they are today, etc.

another day, another Intel exploit: software.intel.com/security-softwar…ware-guidance/l1d-eviction-sampling

total miners 29249

To anyone saying "profitability on RandomX is terrible": whattomine.com/coins/101-xmr-random…cost=0.1&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate

1 kW Ryzen 3900X farm earns $4.72/day

1 kW of ASIC power earns $1.33/day on BTC: whattomine.com/coins/1-btc-sha-256?…cost=0.1&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate

5x1080 Ti (1 kW) rig earns $1.59/day: whattomine.com/coins?utf8=%E2%9C%93…2070=0&adapt_q_2080=0&adapt_q_2080T

i=0&eth=true&factor%5Beth_hr%5D=247.50&factor%5Beth_p%5D=950.00&zh=true&factor%5Bzh_hr%5D=430.00&factor%5Bzh_p%5D=1000.00&cnh=true&factor%5Bcnh_hr%5D=5300.00&factor%5Bcnh_p%5D=750.00&cng=true&factor%5Bcng_hr%5D=11500.00&factor%5Bcng_p%5D=950.00&cnr=true&factor%5Bcnr_hr%5D=3750.00&factor%5Bcnr_p%5D=800.00&cnf=true&factor%5Bcnf_hr%5D=8650.00&factor%5Bcnf_p%5D=750.00&eqa=true&factor%5Beqa_hr%5D=1700.00&factor%5Beqa_p%5D=1000.00&cc=true&

factor%5Bcc_hr%5D=38.50&factor%5Bcc_p%5D=950.00&cr29=true&factor%5Bcr29_hr%5D=43.50&factor%5Bcr29_p%5D=950.00&cm29=true&factor%5Bcm29_hr%5D=23.50&factor%5Bcm29_p%5D=950.00&ct31=true&factor%5Bct31_hr%5D=7.25&factor%5Bct31_p%5D=950.00&eqb=true&factor%5Beqb_hr%5D=267.50&factor%5Beqb_p%5D=950.00&rmx=true&factor%5Brmx_hr%5D=5150.00&factor%5Brmx_p%5D=800.00&ns=true&factor%5Bns_hr%5D=9500.00&factor%5Bns_p%5D=950.00&tt10=true&factor%5Btt10_h

r%5D=247.50&factor%5Btt10_p%5D=1000.00&x16r=true&factor%5Bx16r_hr%5D=155.00&factor%5Bx16r_p%5D=950.00&phi2=true&factor%5Bphi2_hr%5D=46.00&factor%5Bphi2_p%5D=1000.00&eqz=true&factor%5Beqz_hr%5D=245.00&factor%5Beqz_p%5D=950.00&zlh=true&factor%5Bzlh_hr%5D=252.50&factor%5Bzlh_p%5D=1000.00&ppw=true&factor%5Bppw_hr%5D=91.00&factor%5Bppw_p%5D=1000.00&x25x=true&factor%5Bx25x_hr%5D=34.50&factor%5Bx25x_p%5D=950.00&mtp=true&factor%5Bmtp_hr%5D=1

8.00&factor%5Bmtp_p%5D=950.00&lrev3=true&factor%5Blrev3_hr%5D=385.00&factor%5Blrev3_p%5D=950.00&factor%5Bcost%5D=0.1&sort=Profitability24&volume=0&revenue=24h&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=binance&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bitfinex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bittrex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=hitbtc&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=poloniex&dataset=Main&commit=Calculate

damn, working link for 5x1080 Ti rig: tinyurl.com/wrr8565

t GPUs on which coin/algo? RandomX/XMR? looks like -$1.51 right now, loss, not profit

sech1?

GPUs? Across all algos, this is whattomine data

I see, best is zcoin

$1.59

So if you're a hypothetical farm owner and just got 100 kW available power, the most efficient would be to fill it with Ryzens :D

So I guess network hashrate will keep growing slowly as more farm owners realize this

to be fair, 5x1080 Ti rig is much cheaper than 8xRyzen 3900X

what about XX Ryzen 3600X instead?

or does the mobo+PS cost offset CPU price

R5 3600 is actually more than 2 times cheaper and doesn't require top low-latency RAM

yes, 2x Ryzen 3600 rig will be 10% cheaper than 1x Ryzen 3900X rig

and it can probably give the same hashrate, but with worse power efficiency and it takes more space

ah I thought it had equal or better power eff

but yes, taking up more space would be a downside

ROI is bad, for the 90KH/s -> 1KW you need approx 7x 3900X systems that is an huge invest --> ~5250$ with very cheap Hardware

.c 5250/4.72

>3 years and with declining rewards

.rip

3 years ROI and it's good

no more big farms, only small miners who bought hardware for other purposes

yes, that is the last way which makes sense

hopefully there are enough such miners out there to keep the hashrate high

I don't have a good feeling for the future if the xmr price will not skyrocket soon

cause decreasing block rewards

"sech1> What potato PCs does it run on?" You would be surprised if knew what potato is being used for mining.

lol, I think Intel has a big stack of exploits, but is only revealing one at a time to stay under the radar

heh, more like the Intel shortsellers